US-RI · run world-payments-2026-07-05 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 137 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

United States – Rhode Island

US-RI schema world-payments-v1 trajectory: not recorded

Last updated · 14 modules · 54 sourced findings · 137 sources in the cumulative register

14Modulesbaseline.modules[]
54Findingsmodules[].findings[]
27Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 14 rendered modules; click to filter)

Jurisdiction brief

Lead Signal

Rhode Island enters World Payments Monitor coverage as a newly baselined jurisdiction, and the standout signal from this first pass is a three-front legal collision over prediction markets. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha filed suit against Kalshi and Polymarket on 21 May 2026 in Providence County Superior Court, alleging that their event contracts constitute unlicensed sports gambling and casino gaming under state law.

14 of 14 modules
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

Rhode Island regulates payments licensing through a state money-transmitter regime (RI Gen. Laws Title 19, Ch. 19-14 and 19-14.3), supervised by the Division of Banking within the Dept. of Business Regulation (DBR). Currency transmission, electronic money transfer, and virtual-currency business activity all route through a single Currency Transmitter License applied for via NMLS. The regime sits within the federal/state dual structure typical of US state MTL law, with statutory exemptions for banks/credit unions and a bond/net-worth floor.

Movement — NEWCurrency Transmitter License regime baseline established; MTMA status corrected to partial adoption.Baseline module establishment plus challenger correction of overstated MTMA adoption claim.
Key judgment — Assessed · impact ELEVATEDRhode Island's payments licensing regime is centralized under a single Currency Transmitter License, but the state has only partially adopted the multistate Money Transmission Modernization Act rather than achieving full MTMA harmonization as of mid-2026, correcting the prior 'in process of adopting' characterization.claims: wpm-2026-W1a-001, wpm-2026-W1a-003
Open gap — wpm-int-4Rhode Island's Money Transmission Modernization Act adoption status is ambiguous between a stale 2022 DBR bulletin (implying ongoing full adoption) and the CSBS tracker (showing only partial enactment via H.B.7282); requires a current DBR-sourced confirmation.no under-indexing note recorded
No sub-brief written this cycleThe module carries open gaps but no narrative analysis was authored this cycle. Flagged for the next research pass.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (6)
  1. T1https://dbr.ri.gov/banking-securities-and-charitable-organizations/bankingretrieved
  2. T1https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE19/19-14.3/19-14.3-1.htmretrieved
  3. T1https://dbr.ri.gov/media/23641/downloadretrieved
  4. T4https://www.jwsuretybonds.com/states/rhode-island/money-transmitter-bondretrieved
  5. T2https://mortgage.nationwidelicensingsystem.org/slr/PublishedStateDocuments/RI-Electronic-Money-Transfer-Company-New-App-Checklist.pdfretrieved
  6. T4https://faisalkhan.com/solutions/licensing/money-transmitter-license-mtl/rhode-island-money-transmitter-license/retrieved

#

Conduct and safeguarding obligations for RI currency transmission licensees are codified in RI Gen. Laws 19-14.3-3.5 through 3.9, covering mandatory customer disclosures, prohibited acts (fraud, BSA/EFTA non-compliance, deceptive advertising), and virtual-currency safeguarding (maintaining sufficient VC holdings to satisfy customer entitlements). The Attorney General's Consumer Protection Unit provides an additional conduct backstop under the state Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Movement — NEWConduct/safeguarding statutory baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/rhode-island/title-19/chapter-19-14-3/section-19-14-3-3-8/retrieved
  2. T2https://stevenscenter.wharton.upenn.edu/publications-50-state-review/retrieved
  3. T2https://stevenscenter.wharton.upenn.edu/publications-50-state-review/retrieved
  4. T1https://riag.ri.gov/what-we-do/protect-rhode-island-consumersretrieved
  5. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/rhode-island/title-19/chapter-19-14-3/section-19-14-3-3-8/retrieved

#

Rhode Island treats virtual-currency business activity (including stablecoin transmission) as currency transmission requiring licensure under Ch. 19-14/19-14.3, with dedicated kiosk-operator licensing, disclosure, and reserve-sufficiency rules. A newly enacted 2026 law (signed by Gov. McKee, effective June 23, 2026) caps daily crypto-kiosk transaction values, reflecting a consumer-protection-driven tightening of the digital-money regime rather than a bespoke stablecoin issuance framework.

Movement — NEWCrypto-kiosk transaction-cap law baseline established, signing date corrected to 26 June 2025.Baseline module establishment plus challenger date correction.
Key judgment — High · impact HIGHRhode Island's 2025 crypto-kiosk law (signed 26 June 2025, not June 2026 as originally researched) establishes one of the more prescriptive state-level crypto-ATM consumer-protection regimes, pairing daily transaction caps with credit-card-style fraud reimbursement rights for new users.claims: wpm-2026-W2-001, wpm-2026-W10-001
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T2https://stevenscenter.wharton.upenn.edu/publications-50-state-review/retrieved
  2. T1https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE19/19-14.3/19-14.3-3.9.htmretrieved
  3. T3https://www.moneylaundering.com/news/amid-federal-stall-us-states-tackle-cryptocurrency-atm-fraud/retrieved
  4. T3https://www.governing.com/policy/fearing-scams-states-add-regulations-to-crypto-atmsretrieved
  5. T3https://rhodeislandcurrent.com/2025/02/12/r-i-house-bill-would-limit-transactions-add-warning-labels-to-crypto-kiosks/retrieved

#

Rhode Island enacted a standalone cybersecurity regime for DBR-licensed nonbank financial institutions (S603, effective July 2, 2025), modeled closely on NYDFS Part 500 but with a more lenient three-business-day breach notification window. This sits alongside the general RI Identity Theft Protection Act / data breach notification law (500-resident AG notice trigger), and was tested in practice by the 2024/2025 RIBridges state-benefits-system breach and its $6.3M Deloitte settlement.

Movement — NEWS603 cybersecurity regime baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Key judgment — High · impact HIGHS603 gives Rhode Island a NYDFS-Part-500-inspired cybersecurity regime for DBR-licensed nonbanks, but with a materially more lenient 3-business-day (vs 72-hour) breach notification window, signalling a lighter compliance posture than New York's.claims: wpm-2026-W3-001
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T3https://www.alstonprivacy.com/rhode-islands-new-cybersecurity-law-for-nonbank-financial-institutions/retrieved
  2. T3https://www.americanbanker.com/news/rhode-island-writes-its-own-cybersecurity-rules-for-nonbanksretrieved
  3. T3https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2025/2025-07-30-rhode-island-enacts-new-financial-institutions-cybersecurity-law-with-immediate-effectretrieved
  4. T3https://pivitstrategy.com/rhode-island-cybersecurity-laws-you-should-know-2026/retrieved
  5. T3https://www.hipaajournal.com/rhode-island-ri-bridges-system-hack/retrieved

#

Rhode Island permits credit-card surcharging up to 4% (following the 2012-13 national interchange antitrust settlement), subject to point-of-sale/entry disclosure norms, while debit and prepaid cards cannot be surcharged. A more aggressive Illinois-style bill to prohibit interchange fees on the tax/tip portion of transactions (H8212/S2522) was actively debated in the RI General Assembly through March 2026 but has not been enacted, drawing organized opposition from card-network and bank interests.

Movement — NEWSurcharge regime confirmed; interchange bill status flagged as unresolved.Baseline module establishment plus currency-lens caveat.
Key judgment — Assessed · impact ELEVATEDRhode Island's interchange-fee-restriction bill (H8212/S2522) remains a live but unresolved legislative threat to card-scheme economics, with industry warning of national-scale operational impact if enacted; its final 2026-session disposition is unverified as of this cycle.claims: wpm-2026-W4-002
Open gap — wpm-int-3The enactment status of RI's interchange-fee-on-tax/tip prohibition bills (H8212/S2522) beyond March 2026 committee testimony is unresolved as of this baseline cycle; requires verification against the current legislative calendar.no under-indexing note recorded
No sub-brief written this cycleThe module carries open gaps but no narrative analysis was authored this cycle. Flagged for the next research pass.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://www.ri.gov/press/view/21158retrieved
  2. T3https://merchantcostconsulting.com/lower-credit-card-processing-fees/credit-card-surcharge-laws-by-state/retrieved
  3. T1https://www.rilegislature.gov/Special/comdoc/House%20Corporations%202026/03-03-2026--H7607--Frank_McMahon(Interchange%20Legislation%20Materials)--cor.pdfretrieved
  4. T3https://intellipay.com/surcharge-interchange-fee-legislation-2026/retrieved
  5. T3https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/interchange-card-swipe-fee-state-legislature-bills-illinois/743826/retrieved

#

Rhode Island has no distinct state-level cross-border payment corridor regime; corridor access runs through nationally licensed money transmitters and banks (Western Union, Ria, Wells Fargo ExpressSend, Remitly, etc.) operating under the state's general Ch. 19-14/19-14.3 MTL framework. Providence's substantial Latin American/Caribbean immigrant population makes remittance outflow corridors (Dominican Republic, Guatemala, other Central America) a material but state-law-agnostic feature of the payments landscape.

Movement — NEWNo RI-specific corridor regime baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T4https://www.sharemoney.com/us/en/state/rhode-islandretrieved
  2. T1https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE19/19-14.3/19-14.3-1.htmretrieved

#

Rhode Island's payments-adjacent banking sector is anchored by Citizens Financial Group (Providence HQ, one of the nation's largest bank holding companies) and Washington Trust (the nation's oldest community bank, RI's largest state-chartered bank), alongside a cluster of community banks (BankRI, BankNewport, Centreville Bank) organized under the Rhode Island Bankers Association. A small but visible private fintech/mortgage-tech presence (e.g., Beeline Holdings) supplements the bank-dominated structure; no distinct nonbank PSP cluster of national scale is headquartered in the state.

Movement — NEWBank-anchored industry structure baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T3https://www.citizensbank.com/about-us/our-company/overview.aspxretrieved
  2. T3https://wallethub.com/banks/rhode-islandretrieved
  3. T2https://ribankers.com/retrieved
  4. T4https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/435258-10retrieved

The dominant live payments-adjacent litigation in Rhode Island as of mid-2026 is the multi-front dispute over prediction markets: AG Neronha's state-court suits against Kalshi and Polymarket alleging unlicensed sports gambling, met by Kalshi's federal suit against the state and a CFTC intervention asserting federal preemption over CFTC-designated contract markets. Historical consumer-protection enforcement (e.g., the Centurion Filing Services DTPA settlement) illustrates the AG's active use of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act against payment-adjacent deceptive schemes.

Movement — NEWKalshi/Polymarket/CFTC litigation baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Key judgment — High · impact HIGHThe multi-front Kalshi/Polymarket/CFTC litigation in the District of Rhode Island is the state's most significant live legal-precedent dispute touching payments-adjacent commercial activity, testing CFTC preemption against state gaming law.claims: wpm-2026-W7-001, wpm-2026-W7-002, wpm-2026-W7-003
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T3https://www.wpri.com/money/lawsuit-targets-polymarket-kalshi-over-alleged-illegal-sports-gambling-in-ri/retrieved
  2. T3https://turnto10.com/i-team/kalshi-takes-court-action-against-rhode-island-officials-exchange-prediction-market-sports-betting-laws-federal-lawsuit-attorney-general-regulations-may-21-2026retrieved
  3. T3https://www.sportsbettingdime.com/news/betting/cftc-sues-rhode-island-to-block-prediction-market-lawsuits/retrieved
  4. T1https://riag.ri.gov/press-releases/following-enforcement-action-attorney-general-neronha-halts-deceptive-certificateretrieved

#

Rhode Island has no distinct state-level merchant-acquirer or ISO licensing regime; payment processors settling funds on behalf of merchants generally fall under the general currency-transmission licensing exemption for processing/clearing/settlement performed for exempt persons, or otherwise must hold the standard Currency Transmitter License. Merchant risk management (chargeback thresholds, MATCH-list exposure, high-risk MCC treatment) in Rhode Island operates entirely at the card-network level (Visa VAMP, Mastercard ECM/MATCH) rather than through bespoke state rules.

Movement — NEWNo distinct acquirer regime baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/rhode-island/title-19/chapter-19-14-3/section-19-14-3-1/retrieved
  2. T4https://koronapos.com/blog/high-risk-merchant-accounts/retrieved

#

Rhode Island's product-innovation activity centers on responsive consumer-protection regulation of crypto kiosks (2025-26 legislative cycle) rather than a dedicated state fintech sandbox or open-banking initiative -- no RI-government-run regulatory sandbox was identified. Innovation activity is otherwise driven by private-sector participants (Beeline, Citizens Bank's digital platforms) and regional ecosystem events (Boston Fintech Week, CIC Providence) rather than state policy.

Movement — NEWNo state sandbox baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Open gap — wpm-int-1No dedicated Rhode Island state-run fintech regulatory sandbox or open-banking mandate could be located despite a targeted search of DBR's public pages.no under-indexing note recorded
No sub-brief written this cycleThe module carries open gaps but no narrative analysis was authored this cycle. Flagged for the next research pass.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T3https://thepublicsradio.org/business/new-bill-aims-to-regulate-crypto-atms-in-rhode-island/retrieved
  2. T4https://leadiq.com/c/citizens/5a1d8a9624000024006455acretrieved
  3. T1https://dbr.ri.gov/banking-securities-and-charitable-organizations/bankingretrieved

#

Consumer protection in Rhode Island payments runs through the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (RI Gen. Laws Ch. 6-13.1), enforced by the AG's Consumer Protection Unit, with a targeted 2026 extension addressing authorized-payment fraud specific to crypto kiosks (reimbursement rights modeled on credit-card fraud protections for 'new' kiosk users). The Telephone Sales Solicitation Act adds a registration/enforcement layer relevant to telemarketing-driven payment fraud.

Movement — NEWDTPA + crypto-kiosk reimbursement baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE6/6-13.1/INDEX.htmretrieved
  2. T1https://www.ri.gov/press/view/26301retrieved
  3. T3https://www.governing.com/policy/fearing-scams-states-add-regulations-to-crypto-atmsretrieved
  4. T3https://www.oceanstatemedia.org/the-publics-radio/new-bill-aims-to-regulate-crypto-atms-in-rhode-islandretrieved
  5. T3https://www.alfainternational.com/compendium/business-litigation-2/telephone-consumer-protection-act-tcpa/rhode-island/retrieved

#

W11 baseline content is Sentinel.gi-fed per WPM methodology; no dedicated Sentinel.gi payments-context bulletin specific to US-RI was retrievable in this collection pass. The standing AML posture embedded in RI's payments regime is the statutory requirement that currency-transmission licensees maintain active FinCEN/BSA registration and comply with federal AML program requirements as a condition of state licensure, with active federal prosecutions in the District of Rhode Island illustrating enforcement reality.

Movement — NEWBSA/FinCEN statutory baseline established; no Sentinel bulletin found.Baseline module establishment (Sentinel-fed provenance).
Open gap — wpm-int-2No Sentinel.gi US-RI payments-context AML bulletin was retrievable this cycle; the W11 statutory/enforcement baseline was built from primary statute and DOJ press material instead.no under-indexing note recorded
No sub-brief written this cycleThe module carries open gaps but no narrative analysis was authored this cycle. Flagged for the next research pass.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/rhode-island/title-19/chapter-19-14-3/section-19-14-3-3-8/retrieved
  2. T2https://moneytransmitterlaw.com/state-laws/rhode-island/retrieved
  3. T1https://www.justice.gov/usao-ri/pr/california-man-pleads-guilty-role-multi-million-dollar-money-laundering-conspiracyretrieved

#

Rhode Island has no state-specific correspondent-banking or settlement-access regulation; access runs through the federal AML/CDD framework applicable to all US correspondent relationships. The state's 1990-91 banking crisis (RISDIC collapse) is the formative historical reference point, after which all Rhode Island banks moved to federal deposit insurance -- a foundational condition for the state's current correspondent and settlement access via federally insured institutions such as Citizens Financial Group and Washington Trust.

Movement — NEWCorrespondent access baseline established via federal frameworks.Baseline module establishment.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T4https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhode_Island_banking_crisisretrieved
  2. T1https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10873retrieved
  3. T3https://www.citizensbank.com/about-us/our-company/overview.aspxretrieved
  4. T1https://dbr.ri.gov/banking-securities-and-charitable-organizations/bankingretrieved

#

Trailing-12-month (July 2025-July 2026) commercial activity specific to Rhode Island-headquartered payments/fintech entities is limited; the clearest identified event is Providence-based Beeline's corporate deal with MagicBlocks in August 2025. Broader RI-linked commercial activity is dominated by Citizens Financial Group's ordinary-course corporate disclosures rather than discrete M&A/investment events within the window.

Movement — NEWBeeline-MagicBlocks commercial event baseline established.Baseline module establishment.
Open gap — wpm-int-5Private-company/fintech commercial signal for Rhode Island is thin -- only one W13 commercial event (Beeline-MagicBlocks) was identified in the trailing 12 months, consistent with the bias-correction note to under-index private-company signals.Private-company/fintech commercial-event coverage for smaller US states such as Rhode Island is structurally thin relative to Anglosphere/EU regulatory coverage; treat W13 findings here as a lower bound, not a comprehensive picture.
No sub-brief written this cycleThe module carries open gaps but no narrative analysis was authored this cycle. Flagged for the next research pass.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T4https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/435258-10retrieved
No modules match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for United States – Rhode Island
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {"legal_accessibility": {"per_product": {"cards": "regulated"}}}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-08-11. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 1 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 14 module(s), 54 finding(s), 130 source(s) in the cumulative register.