#
Korea has no single EMI/PI regime; payments licensing is statute-by-statute and FSC-centred. The Electronic Financial Transactions Act (EFTA) is the governing instrument for most electronic financial business, with the FSC as primary licensing authority and the FSS as supervisor. Electronic-currency issuance requires a licence; most other electronic financial businesses (PG, prepaid, debit) require registration. Card business needs FSC approval under the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act; small-value overseas remittance is registered under the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act. No bloc-style passporting; foreign providers generally must incorporate locally.
The licensing routes are layered. Only electronic-currency issuance is licensed by the FSC; other electronic financial businesses (including payment-gateway activity) must register with the FSC and are supervised and inspected by the FSS; credit-card business requires FSC approval under the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act; foreign providers generally must incorporate locally. The bank-PSP versus non-bank-PI/EMI distinction matters here: the registration-and-supervision burden falls most heavily on non-bank electronic financial businesses, which carry the qualified-personnel, minimum-capital and local-infrastructure conditions that constitute the core market-access friction. Market access requires a local entity plus those conditions — a material friction for foreign PSPs relative to an EU passport, where a single authorisation passports across the bloc.
This is a standing W1a anchor: e-currency issuance is licensed, while most other electronic financial business is registered, under an FSC-centred pre-approval and post-supervision system.
Outlook
The W1a baseline is established and confirmed. No structural change to the licensing architecture is signalled this cycle; the live conduct-and-safeguarding movement sits in W1b, and forward stablecoin licensing depends on the DABA framework tracked in W2. The local-incorporation requirement remains the durable structural feature for foreign entrants.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
The amended Electronic Financial Transactions Act is the defining W1a development this cycle. Passed by the National Assembly plenary on 28 November 2025, promulgated 16 December 2025, and entering into force 17 December 2026, the amendment gives both bank and non-bank payment institutions a year-long implementation runway. It was drafted directly in response to the WeMakePrice and TMON payment-gateway failures of August 2024 and the government's September 2024 Plan to Improve the Payment Gateway System, making this a corrective rather than anticipatory reform. Two scope changes carry distinct bank-versus-nonbank implications. First, the amendment institutionalises open-banking continuity and scalability and requires big-tech payment platforms, non-bank entities operating at scale, to route through the designated digital-clearing system, a change applying to both bank and non-bank participants in the clearing architecture. Second, the amendment narrows the payment-gateway definition itself: e-commerce mail-order-brokerage entities that settle payments under the Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce Act will no longer be classified as PG services, removing a category of non-bank PI/EMI-adjacent entities from PG-specific licensing scope. The practical market-access effect is a redrawing of who counts as a licensed payment-gateway provider versus who falls under e-commerce consumer-protection rules instead, with the digital-clearing obligation simultaneously pulling big-tech non-bank platforms further into bank-grade scheme infrastructure.
Outlook
The amendment's 17 December 2026 in-force date is the operative deadline for market participants to complete reclassification under the narrowed PG definition and to integrate with the designated digital-clearing system where the big-tech threshold applies. No primary-regulator implementing text was located this cycle beyond secondary legal-commentary coverage, a gap worth closing before the in-force date.
Sources and findings (5)
- T1https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=44455 (Electronic Financial Transactions Act)
- T3https://chambers.com/content/item/4318 (Chambers FinTech, South Korea)
- T3https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cfd884b5-7f03-46a8-bf8d-c3fc9d8eb3a7 (Lexology, fintech regulation in South Korea)
- T3https://iclg.com/practice-areas/fintech-laws-and-regulations/korea (ICLG Fintech 2025-26)
- T3https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/financial-services-regulation-2025/south-korea