US-FL · run world-payments-2026-07-05 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 128 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

United States – Florida

US-FL schema world-payments-v1 trajectory: not recorded

Last updated · 14 modules · 65 sourced findings · 128 sources in the cumulative register

14Modulesbaseline.modules[]
65Findingsmodules[].findings[]
30Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 14 rendered modules; click to filter)

Jurisdiction brief

Lead Signal

Florida has become the first US state to enact a comprehensive payment-stablecoin issuer licensing framework, establishing a state-qualified pathway aligned to the federal GENIUS Act. The framework, created by HB175/SB314, carries a two-tier effective-date structure rather than a single date: definitional provisions, the Office of Financial Regulation's rulemaking authority, and an amendment to the state's Money Laundering Act took effect upon the bill becoming law in March 2026, while the substantive licensing and prudential requirements for qualified issuers take effect on 1 October 2026. Under the reserve regime, Florida payment stablecoins must be backed 1:1 with high-quality liquid assets — US currency, insured deposits, short-term Treasuries and government money-market funds — with issuers required to provide monthly CPA-verified reserve disclosures. The Florida Department of Financial Services operates a Stablecoin Pilot Program under s.17.72, F.S., allowing acceptance of designated stablecoins for state regulatory fee payments such as licensing applications and renewals, positioning Florida as a potential first-mover on government stablecoin acceptance under the GENIUS Act architecture. The Office of Financial Regulation's Division of Consumer Finance administers this alongside its existing non-bank money-transmission regime under Chapter 560, F.S. and Rule 69V-560, F.A.C., a regime kept separate from the Chapter 663 international-banking framework governing foreign bank offices, under which Part II money-transmitter licensees may conduct Part III activities without added fees.

14 of 14 modules
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

Florida runs a non-bank money-transmission licensing regime under Chapter 560 (the Money Transmitters' Code), administered by the Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) Division of Consumer Finance, separate from a Chapter 663 international-banking regime for foreign bank offices. 2026 legislation adds a state-qualified payment-stablecoin issuer licensing pathway (effective Oct 1 2026) and a registration-only regime for virtual-currency kiosks (effective Jan 1 2027).

Horizon · 2027-01-31 (±quarter)VC-kiosk registration-application deadline for pre-existing operatorsadopted · TT1
Standing sub-brief268 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access

Florida's non-bank money-transmission regime sits under Chapter 560, F.S. and Rule 69V-560, F.A.C., administered by the Office of Financial Regulation's Division of Consumer Finance, and is kept separate from the Chapter 663 international-banking regime for foreign bank offices; Part II licensees may conduct Part III activities without added fees. Two pieces of 2026 legislation extend this architecture. HB175/SB314 creates a state-qualified payment-stablecoin issuer licensing pathway aligned to the federal GENIUS Act, with a two-tier effective-date structure: definitional provisions, OFR rulemaking authority, and the Money Laundering Act amendment took effect upon the bill becoming law in March 2026, while the substantive licensing and prudential requirements for qualified issuers take effect 1 October 2026. HB505, the Virtual Currency Kiosk Act, creates a registration-only regime, not full licensing, for VC kiosk operators, exempting already-licensed money transmitters; its effective dates are staged, with consumer-protection provisions effective 1 January 2027 and the operator registration requirement effective 1 March 2027. Across the Chapter 560 licensing base, applicants must obtain a corporate surety bond or collateral of $50,000 to $2,000,000 depending on size and location count under s.560.209, F.S., and licensees must thereafter maintain at least $100,000 net worth plus annual audited financials, with licences valid for two years against a $750 renewal fee.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (6)
  1. T1https://flofr.gov/divisions-offices/division-of-consumer-finance/money-transmittersretrieved
  2. T1https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/505/Analyses/h0505z.IBS.PDF
  3. T1https://www.hudsoncook.com/article/florida-regulator-clarifies-money-transmitter-licensing-exemptions-or-lack-thereof/retrieved
  4. T1https://flofr.gov/divisions-offices/division-of-financial-institutions/international-bank-and-trust-company-officesretrieved
  5. T1https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/blockchain-crypto-assets-2026/usa-florida/trends-and-developmentsretrieved
  6. T1https://www.aarp.org/states/florida/florida-house-bill-505-virtual-currency-kiosks/retrieved

#

Florida enacted the first comprehensive US state-level licensing framework for payment stablecoin issuers (HB 175 / companion SB 314, now Ch. 2026-176), integrated into the existing Chapter 560 money-services-business regime and aligned with the federal GENIUS Act; core provisions take effect October 1, 2026.

Movement — NEWFlorida stablecoin issuer licensing regime enactedCold-start baseline; first-ever record for this module in US-FL.
Open gap — wpm-int-5The cited cumulative FDUTPA enforcement figure (>$565M since 2019) carries no as-of date on the source page, so its currency as of this cycle cannot be confirmed; treat as background context pending a dated refresh.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief191 words · last cycle wpm-2026-08-05

Conduct, Safeguarding & Financial Promotions

Under s.560.1105, F.S., licensees and authorised vendors must retain compliance-relevant books, accounts, documents and files for five years and produce records to the Office of Financial Regulation within three business days of a written request; this recordkeeping baseline is sourced to a 2021 statute snapshot and has not been independently confirmed current for the 2026 session, though no amendment has been identified. Separately, the Florida Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division, which enforces the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act against deceptive payments and commercial conduct, has secured more than $565 million in total relief since 2019, including over $426 million in direct consumer relief; this cumulative figure carries no as-of date on its source page, so its currency for the current cycle cannot be confirmed and it is treated as background context pending a dated refresh.

Periodic update · new data 2026-08-11 · run wpm-2026-08-05

Conduct, Safeguarding & Financial Promotions

Florida enacted Chapter 2026-176 (House Bill 175 / Senate Bill 314) this cycle, establishing an Office of Financial Regulation-supervised licensing framework for payment stablecoin issuers under the state's existing Chapter 560 money-services-business statute, effective October 1, 2026 (wpm-2026-W1b-001). This is the first comprehensive US state-level licensing regime built specifically for payment stablecoin issuers, and it is structured as a nonbank instrument, issued and supervised within the money-services-business track rather than through a bank charter, preserving the bank-PSP versus nonbank-PI/EMI distinction that runs through Florida's broader payments regulatory architecture. The regime requires 1:1 reserve backing for outstanding stablecoin liabilities and provides a substantial-similarity certification pathway tied to the federal GENIUS Act, administered by the Office of Financial Regulation as a second, OFR-issued instrument layered on top of the base licence (wpm-2026-W1b-002). Neither the state-qualified issuer licence nor the substantial-similarity certification carries a stated exemption, meaning the licensing gate applies without a general carve-out for either instrument. Because the framework is grafted onto Chapter 560 rather than built as a freestanding regime, issuers face conduct and safeguarding obligations, including the 1:1 reserve-segregation requirement, from within an already-functioning supervisory apparatus rather than a newly constituted one.

Outlook

The core date to track is October 1, 2026, when the licensing requirement and the 1:1 reserve standard become operative. Whether other US states reference Florida's Chapter-560-integrated approach as a template for their own stablecoin-issuer frameworks is the structural question for this module going into the next cycle.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2021/Chapter560/Allretrieved
  2. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/florida/2005/TitleXXXIII/ch0560.htmlretrieved
  3. T1https://www.myfloridalegal.com/consumer-protectionretrieved
  4. T1https://pinellas.gov/recognize-and-avoid-telemarketing-fraud/retrieved
  5. T2https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/241111-uptick-in-florida-telephone-solicitation-act-litigationretrieved

#

Florida became the first US state to enact a comprehensive payment-stablecoin issuer framework (HB175/SB314), aligned to the federal GENIUS Act and effective October 1, 2026, paired with a Stablecoin Pilot Program letting the Department of Financial Services accept designated stablecoins for state fee payments.

Standing sub-brief143 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Stablecoins & Digital Money

Payment stablecoins issued under Florida's HB175/SB314 regime must be backed 1:1 with high-quality liquid assets, including US currency, insured deposits, short-term Treasuries, and government money-market funds, with issuers required to provide monthly CPA-verified reserve disclosures. The Florida Department of Financial Services separately operates a Stablecoin Pilot Program under s.17.72, F.S., allowing designated stablecoins to be accepted for state regulatory fee payments such as licensing applications and renewals, positioning Florida as a potential first-mover on stablecoin acceptance for government fees under the GENIUS Act framework.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://floridapolitics.com/archives/804440-stablecoin-virtual-currency-kiosk-bills-signed-into-law/retrieved
  2. T2https://www.bitget.com/amp/news/detail/12560605251439
  3. T2https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/florida-becomes-first-us-state-to-pass-a-stablecoin-regulatory-bill
  4. T1https://flvoicenews.com/florida-lawmakers-approve-stablecoin-pilot-program-allowing-digital-payments-for-state-fees/
  5. T2https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/florida-becomes-first-us-state-to-pass-a-stablecoin-regulatory-bill

#

Florida has no DORA-style prudential operational-resilience regime specific to payments; the operative baseline protection is the Florida Information Protection Act (FIPA), a strict 30-day breach-notification law enforced by the Attorney General, supplemented by periodic OFR cybersecurity industry alerts to licensees.

Open gap — wpm-int-2No DORA-equivalent dedicated prudential operational-resilience or critical-third-party-outsourcing regime for payments/MSBs was identified in Florida beyond FIPA breach notification and periodic OFR cybersecurity industry alerts.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief135 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Operational Resilience & Critical Infrastructure

Florida's operative baseline for payments-sector operational resilience is the Florida Information Protection Act (FIPA), s.501.171, F.S., which mandates breach notification to the Department of Legal Affairs within 30 days for breaches affecting 500 or more Florida residents, among the strictest notification windows in the United States, enforced by the Attorney General with penalties of up to $500,000 per incident. No dedicated DORA-equivalent prudential operational-resilience or critical-third-party-outsourcing regime for payments firms or MSBs was identified in Florida beyond FIPA and periodic OFR cybersecurity industry alerts.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T1https://www.flsenate.gov/laws/statutes/2014/501.171retrieved
  2. T2https://floridasecurityauthority.com/florida-data-breach-notification-lawretrieved
  3. T2https://floridasecurityauthority.com/florida-data-breach-notification-lawretrieved
  4. T1https://flofr.gov/news/industry-alerts/2retrieved

#

Florida merchants are subject to the nationwide Visa/Mastercard interchange-fee antitrust settlement framework and to PCI DSS as the scheme-mandated technical standard; a Florida-based payments company (Chargebacks911) has been the subject of a joint FTC/Florida Attorney General enforcement action over scheme-facing chargeback-manipulation conduct.

Standing sub-brief118 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Scheme & Network Compliance

Florida card-accepting merchants sit within the nationwide Payment Card Interchange Fee Settlement, under which $5.54 billion was approved for merchants accepting Visa and Mastercard between January 2004 and January 2025, with the Second Circuit affirming the settlement in 2023. That settlement structure faces a live challenge: Walmart petitioned to decertify the plaintiff class so that large national merchants could pursue independent remedies against Visa and Mastercard, a petition pending before Judge Cogan as of late 2025.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_card_interchange_fee_and_merchant_discount_antitrust_litigationretrieved
  2. T3https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/walmart-wants-out-of-card-class/807972/retrieved
  3. T1https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2023/04/411-about-ftc-florida-ag-action-against-chargebacks911retrieved

#

Florida, and Miami specifically, functions as the principal US gateway for remittance corridors to Latin America and the Caribbean, hosting major money-transfer operators and a growing cluster of digital-first remittance fintechs serving these corridors.

Standing sub-brief112 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Payment Corridor Dynamics

Miami functions as the principal US gateway for Latin America and Caribbean remittance corridors: approximately $170 billion was remitted to the region in 2024 via money-transfer operators, with 80% of that volume originating from the United States. Incumbent corridor infrastructure is anchored by operators such as Intermex Wire Transfer, headquartered in Miami and holding money-transmitter licences across multiple US states.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T2https://thedialogue.org/blogs/2025/04/the-state-of-the-remittance-industry-and-an-outlook-for-2025retrieved
  2. T3https://www.intermexonline.com/retrieved
  3. T3https://refreshmiami.com/news/felix-is-turning-whatsapp-into-a-remittance-engine-for-400000-immigrants/retrieved
  4. T3https://www.macroglobal.co.uk/blog/financial-technology/money-transmitter-license-mtl-us-states/retrieved
  5. T3https://www.bankdirectoriesonline.com/cms-bankshow/Florida+International+Bankers+Association.htmlretrieved

#

Florida's payments/fintech industry is structured around a Miami-centred hub of private, often venture-backed remittance and crypto-payments firms operating alongside a base of 663 OFR-licensed money-services businesses, with large listed money-transfer operators and card networks also present.

Standing sub-brief106 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Industry Structure & Commercial Dynamics

Florida's non-bank payments industry is substantial in scale: the Office of Financial Regulation licensed 663 money services businesses operating 42,846 authorised locations and branches as of January 2025. This licensed base underpins the corridor and remittance activity tracked elsewhere in this brief and provides the structural backdrop against which the new stablecoin-issuer and VC-kiosk regimes will be layered.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T1https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/198/Analyses/2026s00198.rc.PDF
  2. T2https://thedialogue.org/blogs/2025/04/the-state-of-the-remittance-industry-and-an-outlook-for-2025
  3. T4https://apidots.com/blog/florida-fintech-growth/
  4. T4https://builtin.com/companies/location/miami/type/fintech-companies

Florida's existing Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act (Chapter 560) has been amended to bring payment stablecoin issuance explicitly within AML recordkeeping/reporting scope, with unlicensed issuance criminalized.

Movement — NEWChapter 560 AML scope extended to stablecoinsCold-start baseline; first-ever record for this module in US-FL.
Standing sub-brief157 words · last cycle wpm-2026-08-05

Legal & Litigation

The Office of Financial Regulation issued a final order on 13 March 2026 approving a consent agreement with a Delaware-based software company found to have operated as an unlicensed money transmitter in Florida from January 2011 to August 2025; the company agreed to pay a $155,000 fine and to comply with Chapter 560 going forward, an enforcement precedent illustrating OFR's active posture against unlicensed money transmission. Separately, a Miami-Dade-headquartered bank faces a derivative lawsuit, pending in the Southern District of Florida, concerning board decisions on correspondent banking, including the 2017 opening of a correspondent account for Banco de Venezuela despite competitor de-risking amid sanctions pressure.

Periodic update · new data 2026-08-11 · run wpm-2026-08-05

Legal & Litigation

The same Florida legislative package that created the OFR stablecoin-issuer licensing regime also amended the Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act (Chapter 560) to bring payment stablecoin issuance within its AML recordkeeping and reporting scope, adding a licence-or-exemption gate with a criminal-penalty backstop for unlicensed issuers (wpm-2026-W7-001). Under the amended money-services-business and financial-institutions codes, unlicensed qualified payment stablecoin issuance now carries possible criminal penalties (wpm-2026-W7-002). Rather than sequencing market-access liberalisation ahead of compliance obligations, Florida calibrated the new licensing pathway and the AML/criminal-penalty tightening within the same legislative instrument, meaning the market-access question and the enforcement-exposure question for any prospective issuer arrive together rather than in separate phases. This positions unlicensed stablecoin issuance in Florida as a criminal, not merely civil or administrative, matter from the point the framework takes effect.

Outlook

Whether Florida's Attorney General or the Office of Financial Regulation brings an early enforcement action under the new criminal-penalty backstop once the regime is in force from October 1, 2026, would be the clearest signal of how actively the state intends to police the licence-or-exemption gate. No enforcement action has been evidenced this cycle, since the operative provisions are not yet in force.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://infobytes.orrick.com/2026-03-20/florida-fines-software-company-155k-for-alleged-unlicensed-money-transmission/retrieved
  2. T1https://www.hudsoncook.com/article/florida-regulator-clarifies-money-transmitter-licensing-exemptions-or-lack-thereof/retrieved
  3. T2https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-flsd-1_22-cv-20201/pdf/USCOURTS-flsd-1_22-cv-20201-3.pdfretrieved
  4. T1https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2023/04/411-about-ftc-florida-ag-action-against-chargebacks911retrieved
  5. T2https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001424657/000121390025048144/ea024311901ex10-9_cuentas.htmretrieved

#

Florida has no bespoke statutory chargeback-dispute regime; merchant-acquiring risk controls flow from card-network rules plus general consumer/telemarketing statutes, with a high-profile Florida-based chargeback-management firm the subject of federal/state enforcement over chargeback-manipulation tactics affecting high-risk-merchant risk management.

Open gap — wpm-int-3Florida has no bespoke statutory chargeback-dispute regime distinct from card-network rules and federal Reg E.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief107 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Merchant Acquiring & Risk

Global E-Trading LLC, doing business as Chargebacks911 and based in Florida, is subject to a joint FTC/Florida Attorney General enforcement action, pending in federal court in Tampa, alleging use of prepaid-gift-card microtransactions to falsely reduce merchants' chargeback rates and evade bank and card-company scrutiny. Florida has no bespoke statutory chargeback-dispute regime distinct from card-network rules and federal Regulation E, leaving scheme rules and this kind of case-by-case enforcement as the operative merchant-acquiring-risk framework.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T1https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2023/04/411-about-ftc-florida-ag-action-against-chargebacks911retrieved
  2. T1https://pinellas.gov/recognize-and-avoid-telemarketing-fraud/retrieved
  3. T1https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/first_data_filed_complaint.pdfretrieved

#

Florida combines sustained state-level fintech-innovation institutions (Blockchain Task Force, OFR Office of Fintech Policy) with 2026 product-enabling legislation for stablecoin issuance and government use, and an active private-sector product pipeline in cross-border/remittance fintech centred on Miami.

Standing sub-brief97 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Product Innovation & Market Development

Félix, a Miami-based remittance fintech, operates a WhatsApp-native remittance product requiring no app download, using stablecoins behind the scenes to improve cost and speed on the US-Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras corridors. Its emergence sits alongside the state's own Stablecoin Pilot Program for government fee payments, illustrating parallel public- and private-sector stablecoin product innovation emerging from Florida.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T2https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/blockchain-crypto-assets-2026/usa-florida/trends-and-developmentsretrieved
  2. T1https://flvoicenews.com/florida-lawmakers-approve-stablecoin-pilot-program-allowing-digital-payments-for-state-fees/retrieved
  3. T3https://refreshmiami.com/news/felix-is-turning-whatsapp-into-a-remittance-engine-for-400000-immigrants/retrieved
  4. T1https://www.aarp.org/states/florida/florida-house-bill-505-virtual-currency-kiosks/retrieved

#

Florida consumer protection for payments rests on the general FDUTPA/FTSA private-enforcement framework plus newly enacted virtual-currency-kiosk-specific fraud protections (transaction limits, mandatory warnings, conditional refunds); Florida has not enacted a dedicated authorized-push-payment reimbursement mandate comparable to the UK's PSR regime.

Open gap — wpm-int-4Florida has not enacted a dedicated authorized-push-payment (APP) fraud mandatory-reimbursement regime comparable to the UK PSR model.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief126 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Consumer Protection & APP Fraud

HB505 introduces new consumer-fraud protections for virtual-currency kiosks: daily transaction limits of $2,000 for new customers and $10,000 for existing customers, and mandatory full refunds within 72 hours for fraud losses, responding to more than $33 million in FBI/FTC-reported Florida kiosk-fraud losses between January 2020 and December 2025. These protections have staged effective dates: the consumer-protection provisions take effect 1 January 2027, distinct from the 1 March 2027 operator-registration requirement. Florida has not enacted a dedicated authorised-push-payment fraud mandatory-reimbursement regime comparable to the UK's Payment Systems Regulator model.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T1https://floridapolitics.com/archives/784938-legislature-passes-virtual-currency-kiosks-measure/retrieved
  2. T1https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/505/Analyses/h0505z.IBS.PDFretrieved
  3. T1https://www.myfloridalegal.com/consumer-protectionretrieved
  4. T2https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/241111-uptick-in-florida-telephone-solicitation-act-litigationretrieved

#

sentinel.wpm-us-fl: Florida's AML/CFT posture for payments rests on the Chapter 560 Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Businesses Act (BSA-aligned recordkeeping and SAR obligations), newly extended to stablecoin issuers, plus a blockchain-analytics mandate for virtual-currency kiosks and a persistent Miami correspondent-banking de-risking/sanctions-exposure dynamic tracked via the FIBA compliance community.

Standing sub-brief179 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

AML/CFT & Financial Crime

This module's intelligence is sourced from the Sentinel.gi feed; WPM carries the finding forward without independent illicit-finance analysis. The Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act requires AML programs, comprising risk assessment, employee training and a compliance officer, for MSB licensees, with SAR filing to FinCEN upon identification of questionable transactions. SB314 extends these Bank Secrecy Act-aligned obligations to stablecoin issuers by adding stablecoins to the statutory definition of monetary value, effective alongside the substantive stablecoin licensing provisions on 1 October 2026. Separately, a Miami-based bank's 2017 opening of a correspondent account for Banco de Venezuela, despite competitor de-risking amid sanctions pressure, later drew regulatory scrutiny via a consent order; the sanctions-evasion dimension of this dynamic has been routed to the Financial Intelligence Monitor as exceeding WPM's payments-instrument scope.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (9)
  1. T2sentinel.https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/florida-becomes-first-us-state-to-pass-a-stablecoin-regulatory-billretrieved
  2. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) per-JID baseline profile — United States — Florida — Florida operates under the federal BSA/AML architecture (FinCEN, OFAC) with no independent state AML supervisory regime beyond Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) licensing of money services businesses/money transmitters under Ch. 560. Federal beneficial-ownership reporting for Florida-formed entities was eliminated in March 2025.
  3. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-005) — Gap: sourcing-thinness
  4. T2FIM (sentinel.gi) enforcement_action_register (issue FIM-BASE-ENF-003) — Enforcement: U.S. Department of Justice / U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida — Close associate of ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro
  5. T2FIM (sentinel.gi) sanctions_change_register (issue FIM-BASE-SANC-003) — Sanctions: OFAC listing
  6. T1FIM (sentinel.gi) enforcement_action_register (issue FIM-BASE-ENF-001) — Enforcement: OFAC — TradeStation Securities, Inc. (Florida-headquartered brokerage)
  7. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-001) — Gap: regulatory-failure
  8. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-002) — Gap: legal-gap
  9. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-004) — Gap: capacity-deficit

#

Florida's correspondent-banking and cross-border settlement access architecture runs through Chapter 663 (International Banking), which lets OFR licence foreign-bank agencies/branches/offices, with Miami serving as a de facto US correspondent-banking hub for Latin America, subject to sanctions-driven de-risking pressure.

Standing sub-brief148 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Correspondent Banking, Settlement & Access

The module's analytical spine is the asymmetry between bank and non-bank access to correspondent infrastructure. Chapter 663, Florida Statutes, authorises Office of Financial Regulation licensing of foreign-bank agency, branch and representative offices in Florida, with capital-equivalency deposits required in Florida or national banks or a Federal Reserve Bank; this is a bank-only access architecture distinct from the non-bank Chapter 560 licensing regime tracked in W1a. The Florida International Bankers Association and the wider Miami correspondent-banking cluster serve as a de facto US correspondent-banking hub for Latin America and a recognised Center for Excellence for AML compliance training across the LatAm/Caribbean correspondent-banking corridor.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://codes.findlaw.com/fl/title-xxxviii-banks-and-banking/fl-st-sect-663-01/retrieved
  2. T1https://myfloridacfo.com/about/about-dfs/commissionretrieved
  3. T1https://flofr.gov/divisions-offices/division-of-financial-institutionsretrieved
  4. T1https://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0600-0699/0663/0663.htmlretrieved
  5. T2https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-flsd-1_22-cv-20201/pdf/USCOURTS-flsd-1_22-cv-20201-3.pdfretrieved

#

Florida established a state-run pilot allowing certain state fees to be paid using stablecoins via the Department of Financial Services, separate from the OFR-supervised private-issuer licensing regime.

Movement — NEWState fee stablecoin payment pilot approvedCold-start baseline; first-ever record for this module in US-FL.
Open gap — wpm-int-1No Florida-specific fintech/payments M&A transaction within the trailing-12-month baseline window was identified despite dedicated search.Consistent with WPM's known under-indexing of private-company/M&A signal outside big-brand announced deals; Miami's dense private fintech cluster (per W6) suggests such activity may exist but be under-covered by available sources.
Standing sub-brief196 words · last cycle wpm-2026-08-05

Commercial Intelligence (M&A, Investment & Product)

No Florida-specific fintech or payments M&A transaction was identified within the trailing-twelve-month baseline window despite dedicated search, a gap consistent with WPM's known under-indexing of private-company deal activity relative to Miami's dense private fintech cluster. Available commercial signal was organic rather than transactional: Félix, the Miami-based remittance fintech, reported its team doubling from 150 to 300 employees and its user base more than doubling from 175,000 to 400,000 over the trailing twelve months to March 2026, though this growth data does not fit the closed commercial-event enum (M&A, investment, product release, partnership restructuring) and is carried here as contextual background rather than a discrete event. Governor DeSantis and the Florida Legislature signed the stablecoin-issuer and virtual-currency-kiosk bills into law on 27 June 2026, a market-enabling regulatory event for future Florida stablecoin-issuance products, though a legislative signing likewise does not constitute a discrete commercial event under the closed enum.

Periodic update · new data 2026-08-11 · run wpm-2026-08-05

Commercial Intelligence & Fintech

Florida's Department of Financial Services has had a pilot approved allowing certain state fees to be paid using stablecoins, distinct from the OFR-supervised private-issuer licensing regime described elsewhere in this brief (wpm-2026-W13-001). The pilot is backed by Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia and sponsored by Senator Nick DiCeglie and Representative Jeff Holcomb. Financial terms have not been publicly disclosed. Confidence in this characterisation is Low, reflecting single-source, Tier-3 sourcing.

Outlook

Watch for disclosure of the pilot's technical implementation and any financial terms in a subsequent cycle.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T3https://refreshmiami.com/news/felix-is-turning-whatsapp-into-a-remittance-engine-for-400000-immigrants/retrieved
  2. T1https://infobytes.orrick.com/2026-03-20/florida-fines-software-company-155k-for-alleged-unlicensed-money-transmission/retrieved
  3. T1https://floridapolitics.com/archives/804440-stablecoin-virtual-currency-kiosk-bills-signed-into-law/retrieved
No modules match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for United States – Florida
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {"legal_accessibility": {"per_product": {"account_to_account": "regulated", "cards": "regulated", "stablecoin": "emerging-regime"}}}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-08-11. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 2 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 14 module(s), 65 finding(s), 140 source(s) in the cumulative register.