#
Pakistan enacted the Virtual Assets Act, 2026, converting PVARA from a temporary presidential-ordinance body (July 2025) into a permanent statutory regulator empowered to license, suspend and revoke VASP licences, with criminal penalties for unlicensed operation. The Act replaces the Virtual Assets Ordinance, 2025 outright, and existing operators have a six-month grace window (s.70).
The EMI cohort itself shows material churn. As of December 2025, six EMIs remain live, SadaPay, NayaPay, Keenu, Finja (acquired by OPay), OneZapp/EP Systems, and Digitt+/Akhtar Fuiou, four have exited the market, Careem, Checkout.com, TAG, and CMPECC, and six more sit at in-principle-approval or pilot stage. Only SadaPay and NayaPay have reached commercial scale after eight years of the licensing regime's existence, an attrition pattern that reflects thin merchant-discount economics and sustained competition from telco-backed mobile wallets such as JazzCash and Easypaisa.
Outlook
The near-term watch items for this module are whether any of the five digital-bank NOC holders convert to full commercial licences, and whether further EMI-cohort attrition or consolidation follows the pattern already seen in TAG's, Careem's and Checkout.com's exits. Verification of the digital-bank pipeline against SBP's register should be treated as a priority gap before the current standing position is relied upon.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Pakistan's legal and regulatory perimeter for virtual-asset activity was reset this cycle by the enactment of the Virtual Assets Act 2026, which converts the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (PVARA) from a temporary presidential-ordinance body into a permanent statutory regulator. PVARA now holds licensing, suspension, and revocation power over virtual asset service providers, and the Act establishes criminal penalties for unlicensed operation. This finding is rated Assessed confidence: it is corroborated across multiple crypto trade-press outlets, but no primary legislative gazette text was retrieved this cycle, so the statutory detail rests on secondary reporting rather than direct primary-source verification.
A specific market-access consequence of the Act is the Section 70 transitional provision: virtual asset service providers already active in Pakistan before the Act's commencement have a six-month grace period to obtain a PVARA licence or must cease operations. This creates a defined compliance deadline where none previously existed, converting Pakistan's prior unregulated space into one with a formal cutoff for licensing. This grace-period finding is itself rated Assessed, sourced from legal commentary rather than independently corroborated primary legislative text, and is a distinct market-access fact from the Act's headline enactment.
PVARA has moved to operationalise the licensing perimeter it has just been granted: a draft Pakistan Virtual Asset Services Regulations 2026, together with ten activity-specific handbooks covering distinct licence categories, is out for public consultation, with comments closing 2 July 2026 at 4:00 PM Pakistan Standard Time. This is a direct, high-confidence, primary-source finding drawn from PVARA's own consultation notice, and it is the clearest indicator that the licensing regime remains at an interim stage, operators currently hold, at most, a no-objection certificate rather than a full licence, and the activity-specific detail that would define full licensing has not yet been finalised.
A further legal-perimeter consequence of the Act is that virtual asset service providers are now deemed financial institutions under the AML Act 2010, which brings with it inherited obligations including the Travel Rule and proof-of-reserves requirements once PVARA's supervisory framework is operational. This is recorded here as a legal-perimeter fact establishing scope, rather than as an assessment of enforcement in practice. For firms assessing market entry, the practical sequencing is now clearer than at any point since the 2018-era restrictions: the licensing perimeter is fixed in statute, the transitional deadline is fixed by section, and the only open variable is the substantive content of the activity-specific handbooks, which will determine the compliance burden attached to each licence category once finalised.
Outlook
The determinative near-term marker is the 2 July 2026 close of PVARA's consultation on the draft Regulations and handbooks; finalisation would convert the current interim no-objection-certificate regime into a full licensing architecture with activity-specific conditions. A second marker is the practical effect of the Section 70 grace period as its expiry approaches: whether PVARA enforces the cessation requirement against operators that have not obtained a licence, or extends the transitional window, will materially shape the market-access picture for both incumbent and prospective virtual-asset firms in Pakistan.
Sources and findings (8)
- T1https://www.sbp.org.pk/psd/2019/C1-Annex-A.pdfretrieved
- T1https://www.readkong.com/page/regulations-for-electronic-money-institutions-9802339retrieved
- T2https://pkrevenue.com/state-bank-revises-regulations-to-enhance-scope-of-electronic-money-institutions/retrieved
- T1https://www.sbp.org.pk/dfs/Digital-Bank-Regulatory.htmlretrieved
- T3https://www.fintechfutures.com/digital-banking/state-bank-of-pakistan-names-five-successful-digital-bank-applicantsretrieved
- T3https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2025/12/10/mapping-emis-in-pakistan-since-2020-6-live-4-face-death-and-6-at-ipa-or-pilotretrieved
- T3https://digitalpakistan.pk/emi-license-pakistan-in-2026/retrieved
- T3https://www.ibanet.org/the-legal-landscape-for-fintech-in-pakistanretrieved