#
Macau lacks a PSD2/EMD2-comparable EMI/PI regime; mobile wallets operate as bank-linked intermediaries. A pending AML/CFT draft law would introduce Macau's first formal VASP licensing track, layered onto AMCM/DICJ's existing prohibition on gaming-related virtual-asset transactions.
The prudential overhaul embedded in Law 13/2023 lifts minimum registered bank capital from MOP100m to MOP300m and creates a new restricted licence bank category requiring MOP100m minimum capital, raising the entry bar for full banking authorisation while preserving a lighter-capital pathway for narrower-scope banks. For non-bank payment institutions, safeguarding of client funds is not addressed through a dedicated segregation or trust rule; instead, a Payment Services Institution licensee that invests or uses client funds, including funds held for future payments, must escalate to the more stringent non-bank credit institution licence. That licence-tiering approach makes safeguarding a function of authorisation category rather than a standalone conduct obligation, a structural distinction worth carrying into any cross-jurisdictional comparison of Macau's non-bank payments regime against ring-fencing regimes elsewhere.
Outlook
With Law 13/2023 now nearly three years in force, the near-term licensing question is less about further statutory change and more about how AMCM applies the raised capital thresholds and the non-bank credit institution escalation trigger to the territory's payment institution population as it matures alongside the new private-fund regime.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Macau's non-bank payments landscape operates without a dedicated electronic-money-institution or payment-institution licensing regime comparable to the EU's PSD2/EMD2 framework; the Autoridade Monetaria de Macau treats mobile wallets as bank-linked intermediaries rather than as independently licensed non-bank payment institutions (wpm-2026-W32-001). This is a standing structural gap rather than a new-cycle development, and it defines the baseline against which this cycle's licensing news should be read: Macau's first formal licensing gate for payment-adjacent activity is arriving not through a general EMI/PI framework but through a narrower, virtual-asset-specific channel.
The Macau government has circulated a draft AML/CFT law, currently under sectoral consultation, that would introduce licensing for virtual-asset operators generally, beyond the gaming sector specifically, with administrative fines for unlicensed operation (wpm-2026-W32-004). This is an assessed-confidence, Tier 3-sourced finding carrying a high impact rating, and it constitutes the first formal virtual-asset-operator licensing track proposed for Macau. No primary legislative text has been independently retrieved this cycle, and no enactment date is confirmed; expected timing is assessed at 2027 Q2 with a year-wide uncertainty band. Because the draft law targets virtual-asset operators specifically rather than payment institutions generally, its enactment would not close the broader EMI/PI licensing gap identified above.
Outlook
Watch for whether the draft law's scope, once a primary legislative text becomes available, extends beyond virtual-asset operators to cover payment institutions more broadly, and for any AMCM signal of an intention to introduce a dedicated EMI/PI regime independent of the virtual-asset track.
Sources and findings (5)
- T1https://www.asianlii.org/mo/legis/laws/fsadl3293255/
- T1https://www.amcm.gov.mo/en/banking-sector/license-application
- T3https://valsen-corporate.com/macau-payment-services-institutions-license-_guideline/
- T3https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7bc996ae-0df9-4309-b7c6-7adbbdf9010e
- T3https://valsen-corporate.com/macau-payment-services-institutions-license-_guideline/