US-HI · run world-payments-2026-07-05 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 137 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

United States – Hawaii

US-HI schema world-payments-v1 trajectory: not recorded

Last updated · 14 modules · 74 sourced findings · 137 sources in the cumulative register

14Modulesbaseline.modules[]
74Findingsmodules[].findings[]
36Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 14 rendered modules; click to filter)
No modules moved this cycle.

Jurisdiction brief

Lead Signal

This cycle establishes the World Payments Monitor's baseline coverage of Hawaii (US-HI), the first structured sweep of the jurisdiction across all fourteen module codes in the WPM spine. The defining structural fact is architectural simplicity: Hawaii regulates nonbank payments activity through a single state statute, the Money Transmitters Modernization Act (HRS Chapter 489D), administered by the Division of Financial Institutions (DFI), with no separate electronic-money or prepaid-instrument licensing category and no bespoke stablecoin-issuance regime. Effective July 1, 2024, digital-currency and crypto activity was carved out of the 489D licensing perimeter entirely following the conclusion of the four-year Digital Currency Innovation Lab sandbox, meaning Hawaii's approach to digital assets is now a negative exemption rather than an affirmative licensing track, with mixed fiat/crypto businesses still required to license the USD-denominated leg of their activity. The result is a light-touch structural profile that increasingly delegates crypto and operational-resilience risk to federal backstops rather than building bespoke state infrastructure.

14 of 14 modules
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

Hawaii's Money Transmitters Modernization Act (HRS Ch.489D) is administered by DCCA/DFI. Since 1 July 2024, standalone digital-asset activity has not required a Hawaii MT licence (regulator-interpretation-based, less durable than statutory exemptions elsewhere). SB 2757 SD1 (2026) would reverse this via a new Digital Asset Charter regime; it advanced out of Senate CPN/LBT as amended (SD1), referred to WAM/JDC; final 2026-session enactment status unconfirmed.

Standing sub-brief265 words · last cycle wpm-2026-08-05

Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access

Hawaii regulates payments and money-transmission activity through a single state-level nonbank licensing perimeter: the Money Transmitters Modernization Act, codified at HRS Chapter 489D and administered by the Division of Financial Institutions (DFI), part of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs. Money transmission activity in Hawaii requires a state license under this framework, and licensees are additionally subject to NMLS registration; there is no separate electronic-money or prepaid-instrument (EMI/PPI) licensing category, meaning nonbank payments providers of every stripe -- from remittance firms to bill-payment processors -- fall under the same statutory umbrella as traditional money transmitters.

Periodic update · new data 2026-08-11 · run wpm-2026-08-05

Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access

Since 1 July 2024, Hawaii's DCCA/Division of Financial Institutions has treated standalone digital-currency and digital-asset activity as falling outside the state's money transmitter licensing requirement under HRS Chapter 489D, following the closure of the state's Digital Currency Innovation Lab; this is a nonbank payment-institution/EMI-style licensing perimeter, not a banking-charter matter, and the exemption rests on regulator interpretation rather than statute. SB 2757 SD1 would reverse this position, creating a new Digital Asset Charter licensing and oversight program for digital-asset companies operating in Hawaii; the bill advanced out of Senate committee as amended (SD1) and was referred to Ways and Means and Judiciary, with final 2026-session enactment status unconfirmed as of session close. The exemption has never extended to USD money transmission: where a company conducts both digital-asset activity and USD money transmission, a Hawaii money transmitter licence is still required for the USD leg under Chapter 489D, so bifurcated licensing treatment already applies within the current regime. Comparative context underscores the exemption's fragility: of roughly seven US jurisdictions without a standalone virtual-currency money-transmitter licensing requirement, Hawaii's rests on regulator interpretation, as do Texas's and South Carolina's, rather than on statute, as in Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and New Hampshire, leaving it comparatively more exposed to a reversal attempt such as SB 2757 SD1. The interpreter's standing assessment rates this development's impact as ELEVATED, reflecting both the exemption's structural reliance on interpretation rather than statute and active legislative appetite, evidenced by SB 2757 SD1, to close it; this sits within a broader pattern of US states narrowing crypto money-transmitter exemptions. Hawaii's regulatory direction on this question is assessed as uncertain, with the trajectory marked watch pending the bill's outcome.

Outlook

Final enactment status of SB 2757 SD1 is the determinative watch item for the next cycle. Enactment would move Hawaii from the regulator-interpretation group into the statutory-licensing group of states, a categorical shift in market-access conditions for digital-asset firms; continued non-enactment leaves the current, comparatively fragile exemption in place pending the next legislative session.

Sources and findings (7)
  1. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/Laws_html/HRS0489D/HRS_0489D-.htmretrieved
  2. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/dfi/retrieved
  3. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/hrs/chapter-489d-_0109_.pdfretrieved
  4. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/dfi/new-law-money-transmitters/retrieved
  5. T4https://cornerstonelicensing.com/money-transmitter-laws/hawaii-money-transmitter-regulations/retrieved
  6. T3https://ankura.com/insights/navigating-the-new-digital-currency-guidelines-in-hawaii-opportunities-for-fintech-innovationretrieved
  7. T2https://www.staradvertiser.com/2024/03/17/breaking-news/dfi-orders-sigue-corp-to-stop-transmitting-money-in-hawaii/retrieved

#

Safeguarding of transmitted funds rests on HRS 489D's permissible-investments/statutory-trust and bonding requirements, with authorized-delegate contract discipline and a full formal-enforcement toolkit (cease-and-desist, consent orders, civil/criminal penalties). Broader conduct obligations for payments providers are layered on top by Hawaii's general Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices statute (HRS 480-2), enforced by the AG and Office of Consumer Protection.

Open gap — wpm-int-3No confirmed instance of Hawaii-specific financial-promotion enforcement action distinct from the general Sigue Corp cease-and-desist.Financial-promotion enforcement is a bias-correction under-indexed category per methodology §11.
Standing sub-brief204 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Conduct, Safeguarding & Promotions

HRS 489D-7 and 489D-8 impose Hawaii's core safeguarding mechanism for nonbank money transmitters: licensees must maintain a bond or other security device and hold permissible investments matched to outstanding payment-instrument obligations. The commissioner may waive certain requirements where posted security already exceeds outstanding volume, and a letter of credit is acceptable as substitute security -- a flexible, principles-based safeguarding regime rather than a prescriptive trust-account mandate. This bond-and-permissible-investments structure is the core customer-fund-protection mechanism for Hawaii's nonbank payments sector, layered underneath the general conduct obligations imposed by HRS Chapter 480's Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices statute.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (6)
  1. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/hrs/chapter-489d-_0109_.pdfretrieved
  2. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/Laws_html/HRS0489D/HRS_0489D-.htmretrieved
  3. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/hrs/chapter-489d-_0109_.pdfretrieved
  4. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/dfi/mt-faq/retrieved
  5. T1https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol11_ch0476-0490/hrs0480/hrs_0480-0002.htmretrieved
  6. T2https://www.staradvertiser.com/2024/03/17/breaking-news/dfi-orders-sigue-corp-to-stop-transmitting-money-in-hawaii/retrieved

#

Hawaii has no bespoke stablecoin-issuance or reserve/redemption statute. Instead, following a four-year regulatory sandbox (the Digital Currency Innovation Lab, DCIL), DFI determined digital-currency activity does not fit the HRS 489D money-transmission definition; effective July 1, 2024, digital-currency companies no longer need a Hawaii money transmitter license and operate as unregulated businesses subject only to applicable federal requirements (FinCEN, SEC, FINRA).

Standing sub-brief147 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Stablecoins & Digital Money

The Digital Currency Innovation Lab (DCIL), Hawaii's four-year fintech sandbox, concluded on June 30, 2024. DFI determined that digital-currency company activities do not align with the HRS 489D money-transmission definition, resulting in no license requirement for digital-currency activity effective July 1, 2024 -- a four-year sandbox concluded with a negative-carve-out outcome rather than a new licensing track.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (6)
  1. T1https://governor.hawaii.gov/newsroom/dcca-release-hawaii-digital-currency-innovation-lab-to-conclude/retrieved
  2. T1https://www.htdc.org/state-of-hawaiis-digital-currency-innovation-lab-extended-to-june-30-2024/retrieved
  3. T3https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2024/2/hawaiis-money-transmitters-modernization-act-will-no-longer-apply-to-cryptocurrency-activitiesretrieved
  4. T3https://ankura.com/insights/navigating-the-new-digital-currency-guidelines-in-hawaii-opportunities-for-fintech-innovationretrieved
  5. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/dfi/news-releases/digital-currency-innovation-lab-concludes/retrieved
  6. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/Laws_html/HRS0489D/HRS_0489D-.htmretrieved

#

Hawaii lacks a DORA-style ICT/critical-third-party resilience regime. Operational resilience for licensed financial institutions runs through DFI's examination/enforcement rules (HAR Chapters 26-27) and the state's general security-breach notification law (HRS Chapter 487N), under which federally-compliant financial institutions are deemed compliant.

Standing sub-brief94 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Operational Resilience & Critical Infrastructure

Hawaii lacks a DORA-style ICT and critical-third-party resilience regime. Operational resilience for licensed financial institutions instead runs through DFI's examination and enforcement rules under Hawaii Administrative Rules Chapters 26-27, alongside the state's general security-breach notification statute, HRS Chapter 487N, under which federally-compliant financial institutions are deemed compliant.

Outlook

No dedicated operational-resilience or critical-third-party oversight regime is signaled for Hawaii; the jurisdiction is likely to continue relying on general examination rules and breach-notification law, with any future shift more likely to originate at the federal level than the state level.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T3https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/news-insights/security-breach-notification-chart-hawaii.htmlretrieved
  2. T3https://www.mintz.com/mintz-matrix/hawaiiretrieved
  3. T4https://www.insureon.com/small-business-insurance/cyber-liability/data-breach-laws/hawaiiretrieved
  4. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/hawaii-administrative-rules/retrieved
  5. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/hawaii-administrative-rules/retrieved

#

Hawaii has no state-level interchange-fee cap or surcharge-limit statute; two attempts to ban credit-card surcharging (2013-2014) failed to pass. Card-scheme (Visa/Mastercard) rules govern surcharge caps and disclosure by default, while merchant discount fee income earned by chapter-241-taxable financial institutions is exempt from the state general excise tax as a core-banking function.

Standing sub-brief71 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Scheme & Network Compliance

Hawaii has no state-level interchange-fee cap or surcharge-limit statute. Two legislative attempts to ban credit-card surcharging, in 2013 and 2014, failed to pass the legislature, leaving Visa and Mastercard scheme rules to govern surcharge caps and disclosure by default.

Outlook

With no live legislative vehicle identified, scheme rules are expected to remain the default governing mechanism for surcharge caps and disclosure in Hawaii for the foreseeable future.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2013/bills/SB470_HD2_.htmretrieved
  2. T4https://merchantcostconsulting.com/lower-credit-card-processing-fees/credit-card-surcharge-laws-by-state/retrieved
  3. T4https://ebizcharge.com/blog/credit-card-surcharging-a-state-by-state-legal-analysis/retrieved
  4. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/tax/legal/tir/1990_09/tir06-03.pdfretrieved
  5. T4https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/19030613/swiping-your-credit-card-may-soon-be-more-costly/retrieved

#

Hawaii's principal payment corridors run outbound to the Philippines (reflecting the state's large Filipino community) and across the Central/Western Pacific (Guam, Micronesia, historically the Marshall Islands, American Samoa) via Hawaii-headquartered banks. Pacific corridor costs remain among the highest globally, and cross-border settlement access for these corridors is increasingly constrained by correspondent-banking de-risking.

Open gap — wpm-int-2Granular Pacific mobile-money/emerging-rail penetration data was not located beyond World Bank/Lowy Institute corridor-cost benchmarks.Emerging-market rail data (mobile money) is a known under-indexed bias category per methodology §11.
Standing sub-brief121 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Payment Corridor Dynamics

Hawaii's principal outbound remittance corridor runs to the Philippines, reflecting the state's large Filipino community, served by licensed money-transfer operators such as BayaniPay, an agent of BDO Remit USA. Pacific corridor costs remain among the highest globally, and correspondent-banking de-risking is increasingly constraining settlement access for these high-volume Pacific and Philippines remittance flows.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T4https://www.bayanipay.com/send-moneyretrieved
  2. T3https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/reducing-remittance-costs-pacific-islandsretrieved
  3. T1https://bankofhawaiicorporation.gcs-web.com/static-files/1e443a2c-316f-4aa3-920d-ac091d394777retrieved
  4. T1https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2463retrieved
  5. T1https://remittanceprices.worldbank.org/corridor/United-States/Philippinesretrieved

#

Hawaii's banking market is led by First Hawaiian Bank, Bank of Hawaii, and Central Pacific Financial Corp, with the thrift tier reshaped by Hope Bancorp's 2025 acquisition of Territorial Bancorp. Hawaii's credit-union sector (Hawaii State FCU, HawaiiUSA FCU, Hawaii Federal Credit Union and others) is following the national trend of fintech-partnership-driven digital/payments modernization rather than in-house build.

Standing sub-brief128 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Industry Structure & Commercial Dynamics

Hope Bancorp completed its approximately $78.6 million all-stock acquisition of Honolulu-based Territorial Bancorp, parent of Territorial Savings Bank (roughly $2.17 billion in assets, 28 branches), on April 2, 2025, after Territorial shareholders rebuffed a competing bid -- a deal that reshapes Hawaii's thrift tier.

First Hawaiian Bank remains Hawaii's largest financial institution, with total assets of nearly $25 billion and branches spanning Hawaii, Guam and Saipan; the bank has adopted third-party digital-banking and lending platforms to modernize its commercial and payments operations.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000701347/000070134725000011/cpf_irdeckmarch2025xfina.htmretrieved
  2. T1https://bankofhawaiicorporation.gcs-web.com/static-files/1e443a2c-316f-4aa3-920d-ac091d394777retrieved
  3. T2https://www.bankingdive.com/news/hope-bancorp-completes-merger-with-hawaii-bank-territorial/744377/retrieved
  4. T3https://www.q2.com/company/news/pr/first-hawaiian-bank-selects-q2-to-transform-its-commercial-lending-businessretrieved
  5. T3https://www.pymnts.com/credit-unions/2026/credit-unions-take-stakes-in-fintechs-to-control-the-roadmap/retrieved

Hawaii payments litigation activity centers on DFI's formal enforcement toolkit (cease-and-desist, consent orders, civil/criminal penalties under HRS 489D) and on the general HRS 480 Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices statute, which has generated Ninth Circuit case law on credit-card-provider and class-action UDAP claims.

Open gap — wpm-int-4This baseline sweep found no major class-action or landmark payments-specific litigation filed in the trailing period beyond general UDAP case law and the Sigue enforcement action.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief110 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Legal & Litigation

DFI's formal enforcement toolkit under HRS 489D-24 through 489D-29 includes license suspension or revocation, cease-and-desist orders, consent orders, civil penalties, and criminal penalties, with false statements constituting a class C felony. Separately, Ninth Circuit case law under HRS 480-2 and 480-13 has addressed credit-card-provider unfair-or-deceptive-practices claims, holding they are not preempted by the National Bank Act and do not require individual reliance proof for class certification.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T2https://www.staradvertiser.com/2024/03/17/breaking-news/dfi-orders-sigue-corp-to-stop-transmitting-money-in-hawaii/retrieved
  2. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/hrs/chapter-489d-_0109_.pdfretrieved
  3. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/hawaii/title-26/chapter-480/section-480-2/retrieved
  4. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/har/chapter-27-har.pdfretrieved
  5. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/dcca/dfi/har/chapter-27-har.pdfretrieved

#

Hawaii has no bespoke merchant-acquiring license or high-risk-MCC statute; acquiring/merchant-services activity is governed by card-network rules, the general HRS 480 UDAP framework for merchant-consumer disputes, and a favorable general-excise-tax treatment of merchant-discount income earned by financial institutions.

Standing sub-brief68 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Merchant Acquiring & Risk

Hawaii has no bespoke merchant-acquiring license or high-risk-MCC statute; acquiring activity is governed instead by card-network rules and the general HRS 480 unfair-or-deceptive-practices framework for merchant-consumer disputes, alongside favorable general-excise-tax treatment of merchant-discount income earned by financial institutions.

Outlook

Absent new legislation, merchant acquiring in Hawaii will continue to be governed by card-network rules and general consumer-protection law rather than a bespoke state regime.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://files.hawaii.gov/tax/legal/tir/1990_09/tir06-03.pdfretrieved
  2. T4https://ebizcharge.com/blog/credit-card-surcharging-a-state-by-state-legal-analysis/retrieved
  3. T1https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol11_ch0476-0490/hrs0480/hrs_0480-0002.htmretrieved
  4. T4https://payatlas.com/regulator/dobi-hi-4676retrieved
  5. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/hawaii-revised-statutes/retrieved

#

Hawaii's principal innovation vehicle was the DCIL fintech/digital-currency sandbox (2020-2024), since concluded, alongside HTDC's HI-CAP capital-access program for startups. Product innovation in payments is otherwise delivered through bank/credit-union fintech partnerships and accelerator relationships (e.g., Bank of Hawaii-Mana Up) rather than a dedicated open-banking or CBDC-pilot regime.

Standing sub-brief80 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Product Innovation & Market Development

Hawaii Technology Development Corporation's HI-CAP program deployed $62 million in federal funding secured in 2022 to expand capital access for Hawaii small businesses, startups, and entrepreneurs, including fintech-adjacent ventures, alongside the now-concluded Digital Currency Innovation Lab sandbox that ran from 2020 to 2024.

Outlook

With the DCIL sandbox concluded, HI-CAP and bank/credit-union fintech partnerships are likely to remain Hawaii's principal innovation vehicles; no Hawaii-specific FedNow overlay or CBDC pilot is signaled for the coming period.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://governor.hawaii.gov/newsroom/dcca-release-hawaii-digital-currency-innovation-lab-to-conclude/retrieved
  2. T1https://www.htdc.org/funding/hi-cap/retrieved
  3. T3https://www.boh.com/retrieved
  4. T3https://www.pymnts.com/partnerships/2025/credit-unions-monetize-member-data-through-fintech-ties/retrieved
  5. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/hawaii-administrative-rules/retrieved

#

Consumer protection for Hawaii payments users runs through the general HRS Chapter 480 UDAP framework, enforced by the Office of Consumer Protection, with treble-damages and attorney-fee remedies available to injured consumers. There is no Hawaii-specific authorized-push-payment (APP) fraud mandatory-reimbursement scheme; elder and crypto-scam losses reported via IC3 have risen sharply.

Standing sub-brief103 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Consumer Protection & APP Fraud

Consumer protection for Hawaii payments users runs through the general HRS Chapter 480 unfair-or-deceptive-practices framework, enforced by the Office of Consumer Protection, with treble-damages and attorney-fee remedies available to injured consumers; there is no Hawaii-specific authorized-push-payment fraud mandatory-reimbursement scheme.

FBI Honolulu-cited IC3 data show Hawaii elder-fraud losses nearly tripling from about $10 million to $28 million over the preceding three years, prompting credit-union-hosted public-education programming.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (6)
  1. T1https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol11_ch0476-0490/hrs0480/hrs_0480-0002.htmretrieved
  2. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/ocp/retrieved
  3. T3https://legalclarity.org/hawaii-consumer-protection-laws-overview-and-enforcement/retrieved
  4. T3https://hawaiicentral.org/fbi-on-the-bottom-line/retrieved
  5. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/dfi/news-releases/digital-currency-innovation-lab-concludes/retrieved
  6. T1https://cca.hawaii.gov/ocp/retrieved

#

Sentinel-fed payments-context position only: Hawaii's money-transmitter licensing regime is directly wired into the federal BSA/AML reporting perimeter via HRS 489D-16, with DFI examinations (489D-17) serving as the supervisory backbone; unregulated digital-currency activity remains expected to meet federal FinCEN/BSA obligations despite falling outside the state licensing perimeter.

Standing sub-brief159 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

AML/CFT & Financial Crime

This module's intelligence is sourced from the Sentinel.gi feed rather than original WPM illicit-finance analysis. HRS 489D-16 requires every Hawaii money-transmitter licensee and its authorized delegates to file reports relating to transactions in the State as required by federal recordkeeping and reporting requirements under Title 31 U.S.C. section 5311 et seq. and 31 CFR Part 103, wiring the state licensing regime directly into the federal BSA/AML reporting perimeter.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (7)
  1. T1sentinel.hi-489d17-examinations
  2. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) per-JID baseline profile — United States — Hawaii — Hawaii operates under the federal BSA/AML framework (FinCEN, OFAC) plus state money-transmitter licensing via the DCCA Division of Financial Institutions. Real-estate laundering exposure is addressed through FinCEN's Honolulu/Maui/Hawaii/Kauai county Geographic Targeting Orders; the broader federal Residential Real Estate Rule was vacated by a federal court in March 2026, leaving GTOs as the primary transparency tool pending appeal.
  3. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-003) — Gap: sourcing-thinness
  4. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-002) — Gap: enforcement-absence
  5. T2FIM (sentinel.gi) sanctions_change_register (issue FIM-BASE-SANC-003) — Sanctions: OFAC listing
  6. T2FIM (sentinel.gi) enforcement_action_register (issue FIM-BASE-ENF-004) — Enforcement: OFAC (U.S. Department of the Treasury) — Six individuals and two entities (Amnokgang Technology Development Company, Quangvietdnbg)
  7. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-001) — Gap: legal-gap

#

Hawaii-headquartered banks (principally Bank of Hawaii) function as key U.S. correspondent nodes for the Central/Western Pacific, a role now under strain from region-wide correspondent-banking de-risking that the U.S., Australia, the Pacific Islands Forum, and the World Bank are jointly working to counteract.

Standing sub-brief191 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Correspondent Banking, Settlement & Access

The central analytical divide in this module is between bank correspondent access and non-bank settlement dependency: Bank of Hawaii Corporation functions as a key U.S. correspondent and settlement node for Guam and other Pacific Islands, a role available to it as a regulated bank that non-bank payment providers serving the same corridors cannot replicate. The company's own regulatory risk factors note that regulators weigh AML-program effectiveness when reviewing bank mergers and bank-holding-company acquisitions, tying correspondent access directly to compliance posture.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://bankofhawaiicorporation.gcs-web.com/static-files/1e443a2c-316f-4aa3-920d-ac091d394777retrieved
  2. T2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_Hawaiiretrieved
  3. T1https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2463retrieved
  4. T1https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2025/09/02/safeguarding-financial-lifelines-in-the-pacificretrieved
  5. T1https://www.boh.com/retrieved

#

The dominant Hawaii-relevant commercial event in the trailing 12 months is the announced acquisition by Bank of Hope (parent of Hawaii's Territorial Savings unit) of SMBC's Americas commercial banking business, expected to close in H2 2026. Hope Bancorp's earlier ~$78.6 million acquisition of Territorial Bancorp itself closed April 2, 2025, just outside this baseline's trailing-12-month collection window, and is carried instead under W6.

Open gap — wpm-int-1No Hawaii-native (non-parent-company) fintech/payments startup funding round identified within the trailing 12 months; W13 coverage relies on parent-company M&A only.Private-company/startup signal is under-indexed per bias-correction guidance; Hawaii-based fintech funding rounds may exist but were not surfaced this cycle.
Horizon · 2026-Q3 (±half_year)Bank of Hope-SMBC Americas commercial banking acquisition expected to closein_force_pending · TT3
Standing sub-brief168 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Commercial Intelligence (M&A, Investment & Product)

Bank of Hope, parent of Hawaii's Territorial Savings unit, announced an agreement to purchase SMBC's Americas commercial banking division, comprising approximately $2.5 billion in commercial and CRE loans and $2.7 billion in deposits on a net-book-value basis; terms were not publicly disclosed. The deal is expected to close in the second half of 2026 and to be approximately 20% EPS-accretive by 2027. This is distinct from the earlier Hope Bancorp acquisition of Territorial Bancorp, which closed just outside this baseline's trailing-12-month collection window and is instead carried as industry-structure context under W6.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T2https://www.bankingdive.com/news/bank-of-hope-buying-smbc-commercial-unit/816356/retrieved
  2. T2https://www.bankingdive.com/news/hope-bancorp-completes-merger-with-hawaii-bank-territorial/744377/retrieved
No modules match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for United States – Hawaii
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {"legal_accessibility": {"per_product": {"account_to_account": "regulated", "cards": "regulated", "prepaid_emoney": "licensed-emi", "stablecoin": "emerging-regime"}}}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-08-11. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 1 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 14 module(s), 74 finding(s), 147 source(s) in the cumulative register.